if life were a sound, what would it be?

i say either babies laughing or the wild, high pitched cackle of the insane, but have your fun regardless

Any chance you’d consider a more sensitive name for this segment?

There’s a gene for that, too.

Girl, I’ve found two very highly unlikely sources that will blow the so-called “Gay” gene theory right out of the water! And, you will not believe where they come from? From the gay community! Dr. Camille Paglia, a well-known Atheist, Lesbian, Scholar and Author has said homosexuality is not inborn, but indeed an adaptation! Here’s the statement:

“Homosexuality is not normal. On the contrary it is a challenge to the norm…Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction…No one is born gay. The idea is ridiculous…Homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait.” (Vamps & Tramps, 1994)

Second, one of the leading Geneticists on human sexual orientation, Dr. Simon Levay from the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in San Diego, had this to say about the so-called “Gay” gene theory:

NAH3 research

In 1991, LeVay published “A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men” in Science. This article reported a difference in average size between the third Interstitial Nucleus of the Anterior Hypothalamus (INAH3) in the brains of heterosexual men and homosexual men: INAH3 was more than twice as large in heterosexual men as in homosexual men. The INAH3 size of homosexual men was the same as that of women. LeVay wrote that “This finding indicates that INAH is dimorphic with sexual orientation, at least in men, and suggests that sexual orientation has a biological substrate.” LeVay added, “The existence of ‘exceptions’ in the present sample (that is, presumed heterosexual men with small INAH 3 nuclei, and homosexual men with large ones, hints at the possibility that sexual orientation, although an important variable, may not be the sole determinant of INAH 3 size. It is also possible, however, that these exceptions are due to technical shortcomings or to misassignment of subjects to their subject groups.”[1]

LeVay’s finding was widely reported in the media.[2] LeVay cautioned against misinterpreting his findings in a 1994 interview: “It’s important to stress what I didn’t find. I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn’t show that gay men are born that way, the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain. The INAH3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than a part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women’s sexual behavior.”[3] Some critics of LeVay questioned the accuracy and appropriateness of his measurements, saying that the structures are difficult to see in tissue slices and that he measured in volume rather than cell count.[4] Nancy Ordover wrote in her 2003 book American Eugenics that LeVay has been criticized for “his small sample size and for compiling inadequate sexual histories.

Wow! Two homosexuals admitting there is no gay gene! Since the gay community loves to use so-called “Scientific” findings about these kinds of things, then this will no doubt hurt your cause. However, I didn’t need to read these findings to come to that conclusion; I already knew that no one is born gay, it is a choice that one makes! Perhaps this will cause to start your journey back towards heterosexuality! By the way, Dr. Levay is himself Gay and lost a lover to AIDS!

Mandy