Preparing to be crucified… as a Parent

by Miss Britt on April 7, 2007

I don’t know if I’ve said this around here before, but I’m a bit overprotective when it comes to my kids.  Particularly when it comes to my kids and gratuitous violence.

My son never watched Teenage Mutant Ninja turtles when he was 3.  I have never bought him a toy gun, or sword, or plastic knives.  If we’re watching something on TV with him in the room and guns start blazing, it goes off.  Immediately.

I don’t want him desensitized to violence.  And pain.  And retaliation.  I also don’t want him leaping off the couch to karate chop guests.  But mainly, I don’t want him to think that hitting, hurting, shooting, kicking, putting your hands on another person in ANY way is OK.  Or, worse, no big deal.

So, it is in direct contradiction to every thing I have preached to myself as a parent that I let him watch The Passion on Good Friday.  The one by Mel Gibson?  The one with all the blood and guts and “gore”?

Yeah.  That one.

I didn’t make the decision lightly.  My son is only seven.  And I could give you a million and one reasons why people will say I am insane and a hypocrite and Oh My God What The Hell Are You Crazy People Doing NOW In The Name Of Christianity!!?!?

I know.

But I also know that I’ve always felt a connection between my son and God.  It’s as if he was born with this need to know - to really know.  I know that as I watched him go through the Stations of The Cross last week during CCD, he poured himself into the booklet and soaked up every word, eager to know more.

And I also know that next year he is going to be expected to receive his First Communion.  Having taught that class for two years now, I know that for many kids at that age it’s hard to really make the leap - Bread, Wine, Body, Blood, Sacrifice, Suffering…

We try.  We relate scourging and taunting to spitting and bullying on the playground.  We describe nails in a hand the best we can.  We talk about unconditional love - more love than even your mommy and your daddy could have…

But when I watched that movie for the first time last year, at 26 years old, it clicked.

And I cried.  And I flinched.  And I ached to comfort Mary as she watched her son, her baby, be tortured and mocked - so close and yet unable to help.  And I wanted to shout “Stop!  It’s not FAIR!!  It’s not HIM!!!  Take ME, take ME!”  And I felt ashamed when I realized there was no freaking WAY it could have bee me - that never in a million years could I have endured that, justified or not.

And then, only then, did it really click just how much was given for me.  And the depths of love that must have made that possible.  And the level of gratitude and appreciation and humility and all at the same time worthiness that washes over you…

I wanted that for my son.  I wanted him to hear the story of Good Friday and know, the best his little seven year old soul could know.

And so I sat with him.  I answered his questions. I didn’t stop him when he left the room when it came to the nailing.  And I answered more of his questions.  And I watched the awe on his face as he realized - without a word from me - what had been done for him.

And now here I sit.  Unable to defend to my friend why in the hell I would let my young son watch a movie that has been called “violent” and “graphic”.  Fully aware of all the reasons why NOT to.  Cognizant of all the ways in which this collides head first with the smaller extremes of not letting him watch “violent cartoons”.

And yet I know it was right.  I know it.  For one of the very few times in my life, I cannot explain or argue or outline or debate it… and still I can know that it was right.

My comments are open.  Feel free to blast me for letting him watch it.  Feel free to haze me for the “ridiculous” measures I’ve put in place before.

Discuss.  Feel.  Free.

Psst... thanks for stopping by! I hope I didn't traumatize you too badly on your first visit. Remember to subscribe to my RSS feed if you want updates from the site!

Posted in Kids and Parenting - Real Mommy Blogging Tagged: , ,

50 Comments so far

  1. maman April 7, 2007 11:50 am

    How did he handle it? My 12 year old left the room weeping last weekend when she watched it. I am not going to crucify you… There are certainly enough people who will do that to the Moms of the world. And frankly, I have always, myself, made exceptions for movies of cultural or historical significance… So relax… and have a Happy Easter! I think you need a chocolate bunny!

  2. Jen April 7, 2007 1:11 pm

    I would never blast you for sharing this experience with us. Heck, I didn’t even know you had a son until today! There is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting your son to know what the crucifixion is all about. The difference in what you did and just allowing him to watch the movie was that you talked him through it. You answered his questions so that it would help him understand.

    You know your son the best, and if you felt he couldn’t handle it, you wouldn’t have allowed him to watch it.

  3. Greg April 7, 2007 2:10 pm

    Well, it’s a brutal movie, but to an extent I agree with you.

    There was a documentary last year called “This Film is Not Yet Rated” about the MPAA. Films with plenty of violence are rated PG-13 as long as there’s no blood and gore (in other words, no reality), then they’re rated R, and one of the people who were being interviewed for this documentary said that it should be reversed– that the movies with massive, cartoonish, unrealistic violence should be rated R, and the movies that show you that violence is ugly, painful, gross, etc. should be PG-13 so that kids will have a greater understanding of violence.

    I think “The Passion” fits into that category of R-rated films that older children should see and experience for this very reason and others. Whether or not 7 is old enough depends on the parent, because I probably wouldn’t have been able to handle that movie at that age. I was also a puss. So there you go.

  4. Miss Ann Thrope April 7, 2007 2:20 pm

    Firstly, he is your child and you know what’s best for him. At no time have I ever even remotely thought of you as a bad or inadequate parent.

    Having said that, were he my child and I chose to raise him without being subjected to television violence, I would have chosen Jesus Of Nazareth which is always on this time of year and is one of the most moving and beautiful movies I have ever watched. If it comes on in your area, I highly recommend you watch it and not just because the actor portraying Jesus is a total babe.

    I have never seen The Passion of the Christ but I have heard much about it. I don’t think you are parenting carelessly. Only you know what your child can handle.

    Were I catholic (which I spent way too many years being one) and I wanted to teach my child, I would think carefully on what shows I would let my child watch. I think you did think it over carefully and di the right thing.

  5. avitable April 7, 2007 2:38 pm

    I would never blast you. We discussed it, and in the end, it was clear that this wasn’t an idle decision on your part. I know how strongly you feel about this, and I would never want to imply like I thought you were a bad mother. I still pink puffy heart you lots and lots.

  6. AmyD April 7, 2007 2:43 pm

    While I think your post here is well thought out and very moving. You know me, I would not crucify you for your choices.

    But, I agree with Miss Ann and think I would have chosen a movie with less violence. Regardless of the truth involved I think that kids under 12 should be given a more sanitized version until their minds can really comprehend without the fear of nightmares and other emotional duress. Aside from the importance of the holiday and the significance of the day, we are talking about inflicting emotional duress in some form.

    That being said, another commenter noted, “I have always, myself, made exceptions for movies of cultural or historical significance…”

    Cultural and historical significance is a good point here. Simply because suffering was inflicted in the name of religion does not make it any less important or impactive on the human spirit and the human race as a whole.

    Therefore, one might also want to consider “Schindler’s List” “300″ and “The Color Purple” because all are accurate portrayals of historical events that impacted the human race.

  7. AmyD April 7, 2007 2:44 pm

    I should probably mention as well, that I think you are a wonderful mother and I know for a fact that you do NOT take your duty as a parent lightly. :mrgreen:

  8. Miss Ann Thrope April 7, 2007 3:03 pm

    OMG, Schindler’s List. I cannot watch that movie without blubbering like a baby. I’ve seen it a dozen times and still I cry. That movie is incredibly powerful.

  9. Denise April 7, 2007 3:38 pm

    You’re an awful parent! I can’t believe you let him watch that crappy movie! How dare you!

  10. Denise April 7, 2007 3:41 pm

    OK…not really. I just felt the need to leave a negative comment to be different. You know me…gotta be the dork.

    I don’t think it’s such a big deal to let him see that movie. I personally wouldn’t but that’s just because I don’t buy the Jesus thing. We watched something kind-sorta out there at AWANA last week. The kids just watched and went with it…it didn’t have any negative effects.

  11. monique April 7, 2007 3:54 pm

    That was a very graphic movie and I’m sure you didn’t make the decision lightly. I don’t see how anyone could blast you, when you know your kids best …

  12. Blonde Chick April 7, 2007 4:18 pm

    I haven’t seen the movie yet, but my husband and I are watching it with our kids tonight; for the same reasons you did.

    Good for you. I’d rather have them watch “The Passion” than something like “Die Hard” anyways.

  13. Miss Britt April 7, 2007 5:27 pm

    maman: He handled very well, actually. He seemed curious, and sad about parts, and amazed at others. He never said anything about the violence, which surprised me.

    Jen: you didn’t know I had a son? really? wow, maybe I need to talk about the poor kids more! LOL

    Greg: Yeah, that’s how I was thinking - it’s R-rated, but different R-rated…

    Miss Ann Thrope: I’ve never seen that movie - I should!! Thanks for the suggestion.

    avitable: I KNOW!!! <3 <3

    AmyD: great points, as always - and I LOVE Schindler’s List.

    Denise: :-P

    monique: thanks :-)

    Blonde Chick: something in the water - let me know how it goes!!!

  14. Miss Ann Thrope April 7, 2007 5:34 pm

    It’s in 2 or 3 parts. I forget. I think you can get it through blockbuster…the whole thing. You would love it.

  15. The Chad April 7, 2007 7:08 pm

    A long time ago when I was quite young, I sat in church for the Easter service, and instead of the regular story of the crucifiction, the actual story was delivered. It was described just as The Passion showed. And this story was praised. Nobody complained about the violent depictions, even with all the young kids there. And it was at that moment that I realized just how real it was, and that this particular story should never be sugar coated.

  16. Mist 1 April 7, 2007 10:13 pm

    I never watched The Passion. Mostly because, if I wanted to watch someone get bludgeoned for two hours, I would have gone with my ex when they jacked that guy for his amps.

  17. zac April 8, 2007 9:07 am

    first time to your blog, very nice. and being that it is my first time, i hope you don’t find this antagonistic, but i was curious… would you be OK if your son was just interested in learning about the bible/religion but didn’t believe?

    -z

  18. Miss Britt April 8, 2007 9:53 am

    The Chad: you said that better in your comments than I did in the whole damn post!

    Mist 1: point taken :-)

    zac: the question isn’t antagonistic… but the answer probably is.

    I don’t think “OK” is the right answer. I would be heart broken. And I would be worried for him - because I BELIEVE that that faith is necessary. But I would also love him - adore him - and pray for him, just the same.

    And, I hope, have faith that whatever was right for him would make itself obvious.

  19. Mom April 8, 2007 10:21 am

    Ah sweetheart, that movie IS heartbreaking. And I think it’s OK for kids - for people - to learn that some things ARE heartbreaking. Especially this.

    You are raising him to know WHO he is, WHOSE he is and why - that is a bedrock he can stand on, or move away from, as he gets older but at least he HAS it.

    I’m glad, as you said, you KNEW. Mothers - especially wonderful ones like you, should have more moments like that when they stop second guessing themselves.

    Love you

  20. avitable April 8, 2007 10:49 am

    Does Easter mean that Jesus is the world’s first zombie?

  21. Miss Britt April 8, 2007 10:59 am

    Mom: thank you :-)

    Avi, no, I don’t think so. Becuase Jesus is actually alive - not dead walking around. But then… maybe my understanding of zombies is off. ;-)

  22. avitable April 8, 2007 11:07 am

    Yeah, yeah, yeah.

    Happy Easter (really!).

  23. Denise April 8, 2007 11:40 am

    If he’s alive, then where in the hell is he? Does he have a condo in South Beach?

  24. Championable April 8, 2007 1:37 pm

    I haven’t seen the movie, so I can’t comment… I should probably see it. As a jew-turned-catholic, I’ve been hesitant… but I probably should get my own opinion.

    But, as other folks have said, when you take the time to consider a thing like you have, it’s harder to find fault, you know?

    And no. Jesus isn’t a Zombie. All that’s left behind is the Advocate, otherwise known as The Holy Spirit. See my right shoulder for iconography.

    :-)

  25. annie April 8, 2007 2:07 pm

    CCD?
    Communion?
    You mean, you’re Catholic?

    I should have realized that, from your piety, and all…

  26. franky April 8, 2007 2:57 pm

    People shouldn’t blast others for how they raise their kids. And besides that I think that your argumentation is very solid.

  27. Paco April 8, 2007 3:14 pm

    Three words. Way to go! I know how you feel and I think you made the right decision:)

  28. Miss Britt April 8, 2007 7:48 pm

    avitable: you too :-)

    Denise: if only it were that easy!!

    Championable: I didn’t know you used to be Jewish!! That IS a conversion, damn.

    annie: I know… I’m a SHINING example! :mrgreen:

    franky: thank you!

    Paco: love you too ;-)

  29. Miss Ann Thrope April 8, 2007 10:29 pm

    I just watched that movie. I am not old enough to watch it.

    I totally agree with Avitable. Not even in the name of God would I allow a child to watch that…especially since it was a FICTIONALISED dramatisation.

    I would never call you a bad parent…he’s your kid and as long as your not burning him in scalding water, I can’t say anthing. But nothing, nothing would persuade me to allow a child to watch that. I’m traumatised. I can’t even imagine what a movie like that would do to a young mind.

    I wish I could take it back. I wish I hadn’t watched it.

  30. Miss Britt April 8, 2007 10:41 pm

    Miss Ann, it’s definitely a lot to take in. Definitely.

    I, personally, wasn’t traumatized and was really glad I watched it. But I know there were people who felt the same way you do.

    Although, you totally just said you “totally agree with Avitable”. For that, I am sorry. You must be in a really bad place now. :smile:

  31. Miss Ann Thrope April 8, 2007 10:54 pm

    Horrified. I wish I could take back the last 2-1/2 hours of my life.

    As we are all aware, Avi doesn’t have a whole well of common sense to draw from, but occasionally he does manage a drop or two. This time he managed to squeeze out a bucketful. Seriously.

    Dear Avi,
    I don’t think you are totally bereft of common sense, I don’t really think you lack it at all, but I have to say these things otherwise people will think I like you or something. I have a rep to maintain.
    xxxooo
    Miss Ann

  32. avitable April 8, 2007 10:55 pm

    I squeezed out a bucketful of something today when looking at donkey porn, but I don’t think it was common sense. Tasted saltier than that.

  33. Paul April 9, 2007 12:52 pm

    Happy to have found your blog. I don’t know when I’ll let my daughters see it. My oldest (5 years old) knows about Jesus and what He did and why. What has so far most affected her was my uncle’s funeral when she realized that “dead” is bigger than a bad boo-boo.

    I’ve seen so many lives changed I can’t help but love Jesus more. If trust in a God like that can help some of my friends out of homelessness, alcoholism, drug-addition, prostitution, hypocrisy, self-righteous thinking, etc, I trust Him to save me from my own issues.

    Paul

  34. avitable April 9, 2007 12:58 pm

    I trust myself to solve my own issues. Someone who needs to be saved from his own issues is a worthless human being.

  35. Miss Britt April 9, 2007 1:07 pm

    Let me, my friend, dispel a common misconception about faith.

    Having faith that God can and will help you - is NOT the same as “laying around waiting for it to happen”.

  36. Joefish April 9, 2007 1:57 pm

    You let your kid watch The Jesus Chainsaw Massacre??

    I have no judgments and no real comment… I just wanted another chance to drop that chainsaw crack.

  37. rachel April 9, 2007 4:37 pm

    Here is what I have to say. The death of Christ was not a beautifully non-gory event. Filling that day with chocolate bunnies and plastic green grass is cute and all but not getting the point across.
    My opinion is that you don’t need to explain yourself. I think there are worse things you can shove in your kids face or you could just totally tune out and let them get knocked up at the age of 11 like most parents are doing these days.

  38. Gunfighter April 11, 2007 1:57 pm

    Greetings,

    I saw the movie, and I wouldn’t let my eight year old see it… a bit too graphic for her just yet.

    As has been said, this was a fictionalized charcterization of the Crucifiction (we don’t know exactly how it went down), but I thought it was good that I saw it.

    You have to do what is right for you and your kids.

  39. Bitterroot April 17, 2007 4:54 am

    Miss Britt: Sorry to have written a tome, but I just found your blog and this caught my eye. From where I sit, it’s always refreshing to come across a Catholic blogger who is not quoting EWTN in every post! From what I have seen so far - you rock! And so I go on to answer what I’ve seen thus far and to throw-in my $0.02…

    (”Father forgive me, for I’ve written a long comment that practically hijacks someone else’s blog!”) :roll:

    MAT, avi and y’all (I won’t break-it down or it’ll be longer still):

    “Fictionalized” to the extent that there wasn’t an historical “screenplay,” perhaps. But scripture is graphic enough in its depiction, and enough is known about the historical brutality of the Roman Empire that, at least in my opinion, it wasn’t such a leap as to be declared so broadly “fictionalized” as I think you imply.

    We had a parish priest who sculpted and painted crucifixes, though his were *never* the “sanitized” versions you see with a little blood dripping from the brow and the lance-wound in the side. Father Z’s crucifixes were depicted in gory, bloody detail with cuts and bruises and bloody wounds everywhere. He was adamant about the brutality of the wounds Christ endured for us. Father Z died many years before Mel even thought to put his vision to film. I’m certain the Padre would have approved of every frame.

    I was nearly forty when I saw The Passion of the Christ, and I had a difficult time watching it. I winced. I grimaced. I cried. And I’m a 6′, 230 lb. “Bubba” of a Southern Alabama Redneck who has known the feel of a good piece of hickory in-hand to settle a score. AND I’m Catholic. (If I weren’t Catholic, I’d have chosen to be Jewish - but that’s a long story.)

    Every one of our four kids has seen the movie - AFTER my wife and I screened it first. Yes it was brutal. But it’s a brutality that underscores the breadth and depth of the love of our God for us - a love that allowed Him to humble Himself to become Man, of the lowliest among us, for one purpose: to suffer and die for us.

    True enough, The Passion is disturbingly violent and gory. It is by no means the shallow, “cartoon” violence that inures kids and allows them to think nothing of pulling a trigger on somebody, so long as they can hit “Reset” and have another go… “Cool! did you see how the blood splattered?!” (I’ve actually heard that from kids in a movie theater - not to mention teens and their video games!)

    There are other more brutal and bloody “slasher” films with no point other than pure horror for the sake of horror. THOSE are what I would classify as “fiction” and (disturbingly sick) fantasy. They are films classified as “entertainment” and can be found in the “Horror” section at your neighborhood Blockbuster.

    The Passion was never meant to be “entertainment.” It was created to be an experience of faith. Millions of churchgoers did not rent whole theaters to be “entertained.”

    I have no doubt - it was the right decision for our family to view the film. Our youngest was 9 at the time. We discussed it. We let them know it was okay to cover their eyes or cry - even our fifteen year old “emo” son who brazenly declared before going in that he was “sure he’s seen worse” (one of the blood spatter on prime-time CSI = cool! crowd) was silent and very visibly moved by the film. It put brutality and graphic, gratuitous violence in perspective for a change. It was shocking and horrible, precisely because it was personal.

    Our kids were all remarkably open and perceptive, in awe and humility of the sacrifice that was made for each of them personally.

    As for being “good Catholics” and good examples to others? Hell, we’re not a perfect family either, (actually, we’re a train-wreck of dysfunction and neuroses) but we try. Faith is something that we cherish, take for granted, and even forget or neglect at times. But it’s something that is ingrained, to be available to us in bad times as well as the joyous ones. We’re at Mass every Sunday and all four of our children are Altar Servers. Nothing puffs my chest more than to overhear little church ladies complimenting my children to one-another. Of course our parish Priest is a detail-oriented perfectionist who has instructed them with almost military precision borne of a passion of his own: he spent four years of his seminary in Rome, and routinely served at the altar for Mass with Pope John Paul II (JPTG), but I digress…

    Being in the “Deep South,” where Catholicism isn’t necessarily very popular, some of our Protestant friends think we Catholics are “idol worshipers” and gruesome freaks for our adoration before (not *of*) the crucifix and saintly images, particularly that of the Blessed Mother. And then there’s the whole “Body and Blood (Soul and Divinity)” Eucharist thing…

    “You drink blood?! What are you, vampires?” Gah…

    What I’ve come to realize is that every faith seems to take a part of the Truth that they can identify with or wrap their minds around. No one religion is going to satisfy every population and culture. Some even choose not to believe as their way of “fitting in” to their little life-space. (I pray for and on behalf of them too!)

    We Catholics stand on the rituals of 2 millennia and the pure sacrifice of the Son of Man, our Lord. Personally, I wouldn’t have it any other way. Kathos. The church “universal” - to walk into just about any Catholic Church and know what’s happening and what to expect at every moment, even if the Mass is in another language (but most appropriately Latin). Aaah, the sights and the sounds, the smells and the bells…

    I have to confess (no pun intended), I get a kick out of some of the “it’s a bunch of superstitious hooey” crowd.

    It’s a Catholic thing, y’all wouldn’t understand. But I’d be happy to invite you to Mass, answer your questions and even sit by you in RCIA! :mrgreen:

    Of course, this being the Deep South™ and all, if ours isn’t a brand of faith you prefer, there’s the strychnine and rattlesnakes outfit down the road a spell. They must have something powerful going, ’cause I never see an ambulance. Admittedly, I can’t help but imagine a non-believer or two has succumbed… Just be sure you’re feeling the Spirit when the doors get locked! :shock:

    (i.e., Religious prejudice: It’s all a matter of perspective!)

  40. avitable April 17, 2007 6:36 am

    Bitterroot, I’m sorry. You must think that I give a flying fuck what you have to say. Fuck off, k? (Yeah, I know this is Britt’s blog, but since you felt the need to address me specifically, I’ll do the same)

  41. Denise April 17, 2007 9:01 am

    Bitterroot - Uh…that was too damn long to even read so I will simply echo Avi’s reply. :twisted:

  42. Miss Ann Thrope April 17, 2007 9:36 am

    Bitterroot, I was fine with your disertation until you came to the ‘pray for and on behalf of’ part.

    To that I say: Pray for your own damned self, ok? I don’t need your prayers nor do I want them.

    What’s next? Are you going to make me lose my fucking mind entirely by “FORGIVING” me?

    My faith or lack thereof is no less important than your own, ok? My faith or lack thereof is none of your goddamned business and it is not your business to make an attempt at ’saving me.’

    So please save your prayers for ypur 9 yeal old when he or she has a mental breakdown.

    Thanks and stfu.

  43. Bitterroot April 17, 2007 12:51 pm

    Well bless your hearts! Sorry to have made y’all wrap your britches in a collective wad.

    And MAT - I’m not trying to “save you” or anyone else, that’s not my job. But I will tell you what I tell the Catholic-bashing street corner preachers, waving their signs and tattered bibles and screaming in my ear at the intersections in town: I’ll pray a whole rosary just for you. (And don’t think I won’t - it sounds like you really need it, dear.) I may even throw in a few extra decades for my new friends! :razz:

  44. avitable April 17, 2007 1:20 pm

    Wow, talk about holier-than-thou. It’s no wonder I hate people like you.

  45. AmyD April 17, 2007 1:33 pm

    I typically try to avoid heated skirmishes such as this. But, seriously, Bitterroot You’ve made a few assumptions here that are wholly inaccurate.

    At least two of the commenters you have singled out are, in fact, Catholic. So, this “it’s a Catholic thing, you wouldn’t understand” makes about as much sense as as turning the hair dryer on while you are in the shower. Although, I can certainly see why they have to post the warnings on those appliances now. ;)

    You seem to be taking ownership of the Crucifixion as if it pertains only to Catholics. That would be a grossly incorrect misrepresentation.

    I consider Miss Britt to be a sister. That doesn’t mean I agree with 100% of her decisions, but I certainly support her in them.

    I don’t believe that anyone referred to this as superstition. Hardly. The larger concern is that should a child under the age of 12 be allowed to view that sort of violence? And, while I wholly support any parent’s right to make decisions for their children, I don’t agree with subjecting a child to that sort of violence in any form, historically accurate or not, and just because something is done in the name of religion does not make it an automatically “right” (as in correct) thing to do.

    Especially given that no one knows for certain exactly what happened and most scriptures (entries) in the bible were actually written hundreds of years AFTER the fact. That, essentially, is like you writing a historically accurate version of the origins of Stonehenge now.

  46. Bitterroot April 17, 2007 6:10 pm

    *sigh* Okay…

    Actually, Amy, the Gospel of Matthew is believed to have been written as early as A.D. 50, (and attributed to the Apostle by the same name, no less) but certainly before A.D. 115, since Ignatius had quoted the Book of Matthew in his own writings sometime before that year, which is when he died. There are other, more telling signs to date the Gospels, including the absence of any mention of the destruction of the Temple, which was in A.D. 70.

    History, my dear.

    So the “hundreds of years” thing doesn’t hold water. Sorry. The Gospels are considered by the Catholic Church to be, essentially, “eyewitness accounts,” NOT historical estimations. I’m pretty sure that it is on this assumption that the filmmaker based his work, and why it was so bloody. The crucifixion itself was hardly, by Gospel and historical accounts, a sanitized “Jesus of Nazareth” production, though I don’t knock that version for its simple, broad-brush Sunday School message. I have it on VHS on the shelf behind me, next to The Passion. But that’s not the movie Mr. Gibson wanted to make. Mel wanted to intimate the darkest hours - to focus on one thing and one thing only. The Passion. The last twelve hours of our Lord’s human existence. His pain. His humility. His sacrifice.

    As to the brutality of the film, besides the Gospels and other historic records, there are solid, substantial archaeological relics that clearly illustrate the savagery of the Romans’ methods even before the time of Jesus. They didn’t just wear scarlet capes and bark orders and expect people to do what they said. Rome was a conqueror. You don’t conquer and enslave whole peoples with mere harsh language and a few dirty looks.

    Do I believe it’s a minute-by-minute accurate account? Hell no. But I do believe it’s closer to fact than anything previously from Hollywood. And while I wouldn’t *at all* allow a five or even seven year old see it. Hell, probably not most 9 or 11 year olds, for that matter - I know my children and I took the time to experience it through them and help them understand why we have to spend that “boring” hour at Mass and other works of service and sacrifice.

    I NEVER said that doing something in the name of religion makes it “automatically right”. I was merely siding with Miss Britt. My wife and I viewed the film, and THEN we ascertained, based on our knowledge of our kids, whether or not they would be allowed to see it. They were given the OPTION of seeing it or staying with their “fun” Grandma. Every one of them chose the movie, even *after* our threats of a “family sit-down discussion,” to which they usually roll eyes and moan.

    I apologize if you interpreted it as ME “taking ownership” of the crucifixion “as it pertains only to Catholics.” Dear, I was speaking from the only perspective I know intimately, which happens to be Catholic. And I never professed to be a very damn good one, at that! What I did try to convey is 1.) the fact that Catholics are often derided for such frequent and seemingly (to outsiders) “obsessive” use of what appears to be a “gruesome” or “violent” image. We don’t see it that way at all - it’s beautiful. And 2.) It’s a depiction of the breadth and depth of our Lord’s profound LOVE for us. Not “us” as in “Catholics” - us as in each one, individually, in our personal relationship with Him.

    As for the “two people” I “singled out” being Catholic, unless you count Miss Britt, whom I already understood to be Catholic and for whom I expressed my own sorry-ass, misguided form of support (My apologies, for *all* this nonsense Miss Brit - I intend to end it here…) or the all-inclusive “y’all” reference, the only people I “singled out” by name were avitable and MAT. If either or both of them are Catholic, it wasn’t apparent, especially with the allegedly ‘humorous’ “zombie” comment. Frankly, I’d be as surprised as likely avi would be to find out that he has much, if anything in-common with the Magisterium!

    But the real reason I singled-out avitable (though I never followed through in my original post) was for this comment to Paul:

    I trust myself to solve my own issues. Someone who needs to be saved from his own issues is a worthless human being.”

    (Emphasis mine) I never addressed it. That much was my brainfart, and I’m pretty sure avi had no idea why my long rant seemed to point to him specifically. Again, my apologies, for not writing MORE (God forbid, eh?), but I had every intention of addressing the “worthless human being” comment as being particularly mean-spirited and uncalled for. And if I were Paul, I’d probably have muttered in reply something to the effect, “I’m sorry. You must think that I give a flying fuck what you have to say. Fuck off, k?”

    But I’ll just go on faith that Paul is far too much a gentleman…

    There’s a difference between being Catholic and believing Catholic, evidently. There are a good many I’ve met and a whole lot more who declare the “Catholic” title as a badge of merit, like it’s a war-ribbon pinned to their chest for some horrific past experience (I went to parochial school too. I “get it” and I’ll be the first to agree, it was horrific!) - and yet they seemingly have virtually nothing at all in common with the faith, either in their expressions or ideals. Their only connection to the term “Catholic” is to lay claim to some sort of “victimization” based on the fact that they were baptized as infants “before they had a voice.” Their problem - not mine - to fix. Again, I don’t pretend to be able to “save” anyone.

    And before you or anyone else crawls up my ass, I freely admit I don’t know them or their personal circumstances (nor you mine), so it’s not an accusation of individuals, it’s a generalization of the many folk out there who share a commonality of the “Catholic Victim” status. I’ve seen it used time and time again as an attack platform against the Church - and which I have experienced from many, many individuals to draw my own, perhaps misguided conclusions. So sue me!

    I’m not independently wealthy, so all I can offer anyone are my prayers. If prayers offend you - sheesh! Again, that’s your damned problem. I think it’s hysterical, in perhaps a tragic way, that whether someone says “I’ll pray for you” or “I’ll sacrifice a chicken for you”, people get all bunched-up and whiny.

    Considering that nothing that *anyone* says to and about you can hurt you if you don’t validate it yourself in your own mind, I think the problem is obvious.

    I’ve long gotten over it. I grew up Catholic in Utah and was told every day I’d never see heaven unless I wore funny underwear and handed over my income tax records to the local bishop for an assessment of my tithing. (Fuck them, we had the only swimming pool in the neighborhood. The same ones who “couldn’t play with me” came running with their whole miserable families when it was 105 in the shade!.) Now I live in the Deep South™ where I get essentially the same thing from the folks who stand on street-corners and shout my damnation and carry a huge mural of HELL back and forth in front of the window of my favorite pub on Friday nights. It’s hysterical! “I’ll pray for you” is as much a joke as it is a promise ’round here, I’m afraid. Laugh it off, for pete’s sake.

    If my last post was snippy, with the rosary thing, yeah it was meant to be, and I apologize. And “bless your heart” is as much a Southernism for “Fuck You,” if you’re unaware. (Yeah, yeah, I’ve already decided I’ll be in confession for that later.) I was blasted with a chorus of “FUCK YOU” and “Shut the fuck up” and mock pity for my nine year old child, so I essentially replied in kind - with genu-wine Southern Charm™ to boot.

    I meant what I said originally:

    “What I’ve come to realize is that every faith seems to take a part of the Truth that they can identify with or wrap their minds around. No one religion is going to satisfy every population and culture.”

    I understand completely that not everyone will or can fit one mold for or even BELIEVE IN “salvation” - hell, I’ve been all over the map since my parochial school daze, but I found my way back to where I’m most comfortable. For me and perhaps a few hundreds of millions of others, is a comforting, glorious place, and I don’t mind sharing. The invitation is there, but I don’t mean to cram it down anyone’s throat.

    “It’s a Catholic thing, y’all wouldn’t understand,” was a poke at the amazing misconceptions that people have about the true beliefs of the Catholic Church, like the vampire thing. Idiocy like “The Da Vinci Code” has fueled even more, so I have and will continue to earnestly offer to help clarify any distortions or misunderstandings of the truth. (Please note, “truth,” not “Truth” - uncle!) Not that I’m that great at it, as evidenced here, but I know where to go for most of the answers…

    Was the “I pray” bit over the top? Sure. Bad attempt at humor, but with a touch of genuine sincerity. I suck. I didn’t mean it to come off as judgmental, but I see how easily it did. When I sincerely pray for someone, I pray for what’s best for them - to lift them up, not nail them down.

    I’ve walked some shitty roads and I’ve found some peace. If you feel the need to condemn me or my religion, go right ahead - be my guest. But be forewarned: it’s a burden you have to carry, and the line is pretty long, I hear.

    Good luck. Whoever you are, I’ll still pray for you. And I sincerely hope there are some out there who will do the same for me - Lord knows I need it, especially from the looks of what I stirred in here… (I know, I know, “don’t count on it.”) Heh.

    And save your breath - oh, hell, don’t bother. Feel free to “fuck you” all you want in my general direction. I know when to pick up my toys and go home.

    Avitable - no hard feelings, but fuck you just the same. I have a feeling that if we were to ever meet, we’d probably beat the living shit out of each-other then eventually laugh while nursing a few beers (or Jaegers) past our resulting missing teeth - only to do it all over again the very next time. I’ve oft been told I don’t come across in writing anything like I am in-person. And that’s a scary thing… In life, I’m a much bigger asshole.

    Here Miss Brit thought she was opening herself up to crucifixion. Heh. Happy to have carried the cross for you, even for this relatively short-haul, sister! :wink:

  47. Bitterroot April 17, 2007 6:12 pm

    Effing html tags…

  48. avitable April 17, 2007 6:55 pm

    Jesus Tittyfucking Christ.

    Both MAT and I are former Catholics, you ignorant reprobate.

    Next time you decide to make assumptions, sit back, think for a second, and then go stick something long and hard up your ass instead. I’ve got a suggestion - just go give your wife some Viagra, bend over, spread ‘em, and let her go to work.

  49. AmyD April 17, 2007 7:08 pm

    Bitterroot - you carried the cross for no one but yourself. What you obviously don’t realize is that Miss Britt’s post wasn’t about being Catholic it was about her son watching a violent movie. She felt it was appropriate and that is her decision.

    As far as your tirades and weak arguments… an aside for a moment, I’m not sure what you feel you were defending or arguing against considering that myself and Avitable are close, personal friends of Britt’s, in fact, Britt hasn’t addressed these things because she is currently on a plane coming home from Avi’s house. The point here is that there was no defense or cross carrying necessary.

    And, considering that you didn’t realize you were specifically targeting people of your own faith - a word of advice, you might want to investigate before you start coming in trying to play hero.

    Granted, Britt keeps an open forum where most if not all opinions are welcome and many of us follow suit - but the fact is, everyone had an opinion on this and many of us don’t choose to take every thing relating to religion with the hellfire and brimstone seriousness that you apparently require to get your point across.

    And, in addition - as far as history goes, never assume the person you are addressing knows less than you do, dear.

    As I seem to recall at one point the Catholic Church also didn’t agree with eating meat on Fridays… that was later abolished by the Pope. So basically, as far as sticking to facts and history goes - the Catholic Church is probably the last word that should carry any sort of weight on the subject of fact or fiction when they are willing to change the rules on any given whim.

    (My apologies to any Catholics who may have been offended by that last part! :D )

  50. Miss Britt April 18, 2007 10:20 am

    Um, gosh… I’m not even sure what to say on all of this. Because holy shit there is a LOT.

    1. I’m glad y’all feel free to express yourselves here. Seriously.

    2. This post wasn’t intended to be about religion in as much as it was about exposing my child to graphic violence “in the name of” religion.

    3. I do not own the Catholic faith - nor do any of her members. I would never DREAM of calling someone a “good” Catholic or a “bad” Catholic… except for myself.

    4. Feeling part of something bigger than yourself is a natural human need. To bond with others based on similarities - in your beliefs, in your practices, etc. - is understandable.

    But why in the hell do Christians constantly feel the need to strengthen that bond by turning it into a wall. An Us vs. Them club? A mountain of rules and regulations that must be climbed in order to really ‘get’ it?

    and that is all I have to say about that. :-)

Leave a Comment

Name

Email

Website

Comments

More Blog Posts

Previous Post: I’ve lost mah mojo